I hope it has been clear from the outset that I am very concerned about getting the data right on this blog. I have been relying on the data the City provides the Norman Transcript for most of the NFST collections data, filling in with numbers from the Oklahoma Tax Commission (OTC) when those numbers aren't explicitly provided. It turns out that the information provided to the Transcript has been flawed, at least for my purposes, because it does not include Use Tax collections that go into the NFST fund.
In order to bring you the best information available, I have decided to switch over to OTC data alone. What follows are the basic collection numbers using OTC data; the projections are the same as before. I think these numbers are more accurate than the numbers I was using before (although they aren't very different - Use Tax collections are about 5% of Sales Tax collections).
Method 1
Month
|
NFST actual
|
NFST projected
|
Cumulative surplus
|
January
|
$769,029
|
$870,665
|
-$101,636
|
February
|
$811,144
|
$814,493
|
-$104,985
|
March
|
$845,058
|
$870,665
|
-$130,591
|
April
|
$769,012
|
$842,579
|
-$204,159
|
May
|
$797,041
|
$870,665
|
-$277,782
|
June
|
$799,223
|
$842,579
|
-$321,139
|
July
|
$805,400
|
$870,665
|
-$386,403
|
August
|
$838,611
|
$870,665
|
-$418,457
|
September
|
$811,645
|
$842,579
|
-$449,391
|
October
|
$780,689
|
$870,665
|
-$539,367
|
November
|
$843,752
|
$842,579
|
-$583,194
|
December
|
TBA
|
$870,665
|
TBA
|
Method 2
Month
|
NFST actual
|
NFST projected
|
Cumulative surplus
|
January
|
$769,029
|
$779,183
|
-$10,154
|
February
|
$811,144
|
$834,692
|
-$33,702
|
March
|
$845,058
|
$821,329
|
-$130,591
|
April
|
$769,012
|
$836,475
|
-$9,973
|
May
|
$797,041
|
$840,860
|
-$104,437
|
June
|
$799,223
|
$879,922
|
-$148,256
|
July
|
$805,400
|
$836,748
|
-$228,955
|
August
|
$838,611
|
$890,201
|
-$260,303
|
September
|
$811,645
|
$842,916
|
-$311,893
|
October
|
$780,689
|
$807,966
|
-$370,441
|
November
|
$843,752
|
$901,509
|
-$428,198
|
December
|
TBA
|
$980,661
|
TBA
|
What do the new numbers show? Things don’t look quite as bad … the City was actually underreporting its own NSFT collections to the Norman Transcript!
That being said, we are still looking at a 4%-5% shortfall in NFST funds for calendar year 2016. Starting with a significantly lower base year means a 4%-5% shortfall in total funds even if we meet the original optimistic growth projections (2% increase in CY2017 and 4.15% increase per year through the sunset of the tax at the end of CY2030). To make our original projections, Norman would need to experience tremendous economic growth.
That being said, we are still looking at a 4%-5% shortfall in NFST funds for calendar year 2016. Starting with a significantly lower base year means a 4%-5% shortfall in total funds even if we meet the original optimistic growth projections (2% increase in CY2017 and 4.15% increase per year through the sunset of the tax at the end of CY2030). To make our original projections, Norman would need to experience tremendous economic growth.